By Jeff Thomas, Feature Writer for Doug Casey’s International Man and Strategic Wealth Preservation
In 1978, ABC News created a new programme in the US, named for the “20/20” measurement of visual acuity. For 38 years, the programme has remained popular, through its format of in-depth news stories.
The 20/20 number is itself of significance in the present year’s news events. In January of this year, the Dow closed above 20,000 for the first time in history. New President Donald Trump glowed in the event, which many of his supporters say is due to the expectations of what his presidency will do for business.
If, however, we measure the Dow against the price of gold (the foremost measure of wealth for the last several thousand years) the Dow presently comes in at roughly 18.1 ounces of gold. However, the Dow reached its peak as compared to gold in 1999, at 49 ounces. Since that time, the Dow has fallen more than 62%.DOW's 19 Year Performance:
Of course, valued in dollars, the Dow would seem to have done well and, for some years, the dollar’s value has steadily increased against other currencies. However, as readers of this publication may be aware, the dollar is only doing well against other currencies, as so many other currencies are in trouble and may soon collapse. The dollar is therefore merely the best looking horse in the glue factory. If we were to compare the 2017 Dow to the 1999 Dow in 1999 dollars, the drop would be 80%. In this light, the present glow of the Dow dims considerably.
For many of us, the above number of zeroes is difficult to contemplate, yet twenty trillion dollars is the level of debt that the US will reach by June of 2017 at the present rate of increase. (As compared to 1999, this is an increase of over 353%.)The present debt equates to roughly $160,000 per taxpayer. Added to that debt would be credit card, auto, mortgage and student debt. The question would then arise, “How is it possible that that level of debt can ever be paid?” The answer, of course, is that repayment is utterly impossible. The US taxpayer is presently digging a hole that’s too deep to get out of and his government is doing the same.
And so, regardless of any positive spin that the media might put on the present situation, the 20/20 news is not terribly promising.
The Dow’s future
Markets periodically form bubbles. The present bubble is one for the record books. Accompanying any bubble is the perception by many that “The sky’s the limit!” Although this invariably proves false, brokers and others who benefit from market transactions are fond of saying, “We’re nowhere near the top.” The more enthusiasm they can create for greater flurries of buying, the more money they make. Not surprisingly then, major bull markets typically don’t end with a whimper, but with a major upside spike. We can therefore expect that, at some point, a black swan, armed with a pin, will burst the bubble and we shall witness a market with its collective jaw once again on the floor, aghast over what had been inevitable.
The Debt’s Future
Historically, national debts have also often formed bubbles. For literally thousands of years, political leaders have seen debt as a temporary solution to their own mismanagement. And if one leader increases debt significantly, his successor can generally be counted on to do the same. What goes up must come down and, when massive debt comes down, it invariably does so with a crash. Today, we’re witnessing the greatest level of debt in history and the resultant crash can also be expected to be the greatest in history.
In 2007/2008, we entered the Greater Depression, yet the media have done an effective job of convincing the public that it was merely a recession. Their greatest argument in doing so has been to say, “How can we be in a recession if the Dow is going up?” And the public have nodded their approval. In so doing, they’ve justified continued borrowing to themselves and, not surprisingly, governments have done the same.
The crash, when it arrives, will take many people unawares and they will lose much, and possibly all of their wealth. (The level of personal debt is so great now that most people are already bankrupt, they just don’t realise it yet.)
Markets and fiat currencies survive primarily on confidence. As long as the public believe that a market will rise; as long as they believe that a fiat currency has value, that confidence may assure the continuation. However, when the black swan pricks the bubble, that confidence vanishes overnight.
If our foresight is 20/20, we’ll take a lesson from a very consistent history and admit to ourselves that a collapse is in our future and may even be around the corner.
If this is so, we might consider another “20/20” - the year 2020, which will be the year that the new president will be up for possible re-election. If an economic collapse occurs on his watch, it will matter little how well-intended he might have been, or even how successful some of his plans might have been. Any potential he might have had or accomplishments he might have made will pale with the importance of an economic collapse. If it occurs on his watch, he will vilified by all but his hard-core supporters.
In such cases, history shows that the next leader that a people choose is always from the opposing philosophy of the one that “caused” the crash. In 2020, Americans can expect to see a major wave of preference for a collectivist leader, a wave that first occurred in 1932 with the election of Franklin Roosevelt, after a similar, but lesser crash.
It’s a truism that the severity of a hangover is relative to the amount of alcohol consumed the night before. In the present case, the high has been the most extreme in history. The hangover can therefore be expected to be the most prolonged in history.
Following the crash of 1929, the hangover did not truly end until 1946. A seventeen-year advancement of collectivism would therefore be likely to be the minimum that can be expected for the US. By that time, conditions can be expected to be truly Orwellian.
However, this does not mean that all in the US are doomed. It only means that they would be wise to consider what their choices are. They may choose to get out of the market, or even to get out of the US and head for a country that is not in such great danger of economic collapse. It’s a big world and the choices are many.
Reprinted with permission.
Reprinted with permission.